Webflow sync, pageviews & more.
NEW

What are the differentiators of the multi-language solution for Webflow called Linguana in comparison to Weglot?

TL;DR
  • Linguana uses SEO-friendly subdirectories and hosts translations within Webflow, giving full content control, while Weglot uses subdomains and hosts translations externally.
  • Linguana creates static translated pages suitable for simple sites, whereas Weglot dynamically translates all content including CMS items.
  • Linguana requires more manual setup but offers flat-rate pricing and full customization; Weglot is plug-and-play with advanced tools but has a tiered pricing model that can be costly for large sites.

Linguana and Weglot both provide multilingual solutions for Webflow, but they differ significantly in terms of data ownership, SEO structure, integration method, and pricing. Here's a breakdown:

1. SEO & URL Structure

  • Linguana uses subdirectories (e.g., /fr/, /es/), which are SEO-friendly and recommended by Google.
  • Weglot uses subdomains (e.g., fr.yoursite.com), which require DNS setup and may split SEO authority.

2. Language Hosting & Data Ownership

  • Linguana hosts all translated content on your own Webflow project, giving you 100% control and ownership over your content.
  • Weglot hosts translations on its own servers, meaning the translated pages are proxied and you're dependent on an external source.

3. CMS / Static Page Translation

  • Linguana creates static copies of your Webflow pages for each language variant. Ideal for sites with few dynamic updates.
  • Weglot dynamically translates content—including CMS items—on page load via JavaScript or server-side rendering.

4. Translation Editing & Interface

  • Linguana provides a simple UI inside its own dashboard to edit translations manually.
  • Weglot offers a more advanced translation management interface, including glossary, automatic detection, and machine translation suggestions.

5. Integration Method

  • Linguana works by republishing static multi-language pages in Webflow and linking them with language switchers.
  • Weglot layers translations on top using JavaScript or proxying, which makes setup faster but limits native control.

6. Pricing Model

  • Linguana offers flat-rate pricing based on number of languages and page limits, and can be cost-efficient for small to mid-size websites.
  • Weglot uses a tiered subscription model based on word count and page views, which can become expensive for content-rich or high-traffic sites.

7. Compatibility & Customization

  • Linguana requires more manual setup but is fully customizable within Webflow's Designer.
  • Weglot offers plug-and-play convenience, but custom styling or behavior might require additional JavaScript tuning.

Summary

Linguana stands out for its on-site SEO control, static page builds, and full content ownership, making it ideal for static Webflow sites that prioritize performance and long-term SEO. Weglot excels in dynamic translation and ease of setup, making it suitable for fast deployment and sites needing continuous multilingual content updates. Choose based on your needs: control and SEO (Linguana) vs. flexibility and speed (Weglot).

Rate this answer

Other Webflow Questions