Linguana and Weglot both provide multilingual solutions for Webflow, but they differ significantly in terms of data ownership, SEO structure, integration method, and pricing. Here's a breakdown:
1. SEO & URL Structure
- Linguana uses subdirectories (e.g.,
/fr/
, /es/
), which are SEO-friendly and recommended by Google. - Weglot uses subdomains (e.g.,
fr.yoursite.com
), which require DNS setup and may split SEO authority.
2. Language Hosting & Data Ownership
- Linguana hosts all translated content on your own Webflow project, giving you 100% control and ownership over your content.
- Weglot hosts translations on its own servers, meaning the translated pages are proxied and you're dependent on an external source.
3. CMS / Static Page Translation
- Linguana creates static copies of your Webflow pages for each language variant. Ideal for sites with few dynamic updates.
- Weglot dynamically translates content—including CMS items—on page load via JavaScript or server-side rendering.
4. Translation Editing & Interface
- Linguana provides a simple UI inside its own dashboard to edit translations manually.
- Weglot offers a more advanced translation management interface, including glossary, automatic detection, and machine translation suggestions.
5. Integration Method
- Linguana works by republishing static multi-language pages in Webflow and linking them with language switchers.
- Weglot layers translations on top using JavaScript or proxying, which makes setup faster but limits native control.
6. Pricing Model
- Linguana offers flat-rate pricing based on number of languages and page limits, and can be cost-efficient for small to mid-size websites.
- Weglot uses a tiered subscription model based on word count and page views, which can become expensive for content-rich or high-traffic sites.
7. Compatibility & Customization
- Linguana requires more manual setup but is fully customizable within Webflow's Designer.
- Weglot offers plug-and-play convenience, but custom styling or behavior might require additional JavaScript tuning.
Summary
Linguana stands out for its on-site SEO control, static page builds, and full content ownership, making it ideal for static Webflow sites that prioritize performance and long-term SEO. Weglot excels in dynamic translation and ease of setup, making it suitable for fast deployment and sites needing continuous multilingual content updates. Choose based on your needs: control and SEO (Linguana) vs. flexibility and speed (Weglot).