What are your thoughts on a Webflow alternative that offers additional features like live code editing, tablet landscape mode, tables support, file upload, font icon support, progress bars, and collapsible elements? Some users find the UI clunky and certain elements slow to load, but it allows importing Webflow generated sites and direct code import. There's been discussion on Product Hunt about whether this is a blatant rip off of Webflow. What do you think?

You're describing an emerging Webflow alternative with enhanced features and mixed feedback. Here's a breakdown of how it compares and what this could mean.

1. Feature Comparison with Webflow

This alternative seems to address some known Webflow limitations:

• Live code editing: Webflow doesn’t offer this natively; it’s a major gap if you need real-time JS/HTML/CSS tweaks.
• Tablet landscape mode: Webflow jumps from desktop to tablet portrait; this is a valuable addition for more granular responsiveness.
• Tables: Webflow lacks native table elements—users often rely on div workarounds or HTML embeds.
• File upload: Webflow users need third-party tools or custom forms to support this; native support is a practical upgrade.
• Font icon support: Webflow encourages SVG, but lacks native font icon integration like Font Awesome via CDN.
• Progress bars and collapsible sections: These are achievable in Webflow using interactions but aren’t native components—direct elements simplify development.

Overall, this competitor appears to fill functional gaps that power users often patch manually in Webflow.

2. UI & Performance Concerns

Despite feature depth, users report:

• Clunky UI: A polished user interface is crucial—Webflow's visual consistency is one of its strongest assets.
• Slow element loading: Performance issues in a visual builder significantly impact UX, especially for larger builds.

If this competitor can't match Webflow’s performance and UX polish, these advanced features may not be enough to convince users to switch.

3. Compatibility & Import Options

Allowing users to:

• Import Webflow sites suggests an effort to reduce migration friction.
• Import direct code offers more flexibility for developers, which Webflow restricts due to its no-code positioning.

This dual compatibility gives it an edge in developer-friendliness, assuming import fidelity is high.

4. Product Hunt Criticism

Mentions of it being a rip-off may stem from:

• Visual or functional cloning of Webflow’s UI or workflows.
• Limited innovation beyond feature expansion.

However, if they’re genuinely solving user pain points and adding new capabilities, it could still position itself as a legitimate alternative—just as Figma built on Sketch’s foundation.

Summary

This Webflow alternative appears to target gaps in Webflow’s offering—especially for dev-heavy users—with live code editing and more native elements. However, criticisms of slow performance and clunky UI could undermine its potential. While some may see it as imitative, its addition of highly requested features suggests a differentiated value proposition for advanced users willing to trade polish for flexibility.